Every week, we offer up Three Things:
concise ideas, insights, and best practices to help your organization move more people to action.

Return on overhead investment

Mon August 17, 2009
My very first post on this blog in January was a response to a post from Sasha Dichter about separating “program” expenses from “overhead” expenses.  The non-profit world generally looks down on high overhead relative to program expenses.  And program delivery is the key component for fulfilling the organization’s mission.  My may point was:

“I think my point is that we need to view all expenses as investments.  You don’t invest in anything unless you at least have a target return in mind.  If your annual report can articluate the return on all of your investments, including overhead, and that number improves over time, then you’re well on your way to making an impressive case for an increase in funding from investors.”

As usual, Dichter is back and says it even better:(link: http://sashadichter.wordpress.com/2009/08/12/too-much-nonprofit-marketing/)

“Let us not, as a sector, fall into the trap of listening to critics who say that we should minimize the dollars, effort, brain power, and ingenuity that goes into everything but the “real” work (programs).  In so doing, we risk forgetting that our role is BOTH to find solutions to the persistent problems of inequality and injustice and malnutrition and infant mortality and safe drinking water and AIDS and malaria…AND to figure out how to explain to the world that these problems matter, that we have the tools to solve them, and that if was have the tools to solve them, then we must all act.”

I think a snapshot financial summary that separates overhead from program expenses, but does not spell out the return on your overhead investment misses the mark.  And when your data is incomplete, the decisions based on that data is likely to be less than optimal.  Good enough: sure.  But room for improvement.
So the question for the week: what’s the return your getting on your marketing, fundraising, communications and adminstrative expenses?  How do you know?  Can you demonstrate it?

My very first post on this blog in January was a response to a post from Sasha Dichter about separating “program” expenses from “overhead” expenses.  The non-profit world generally looks down on high overhead relative to program expenses.  While program delivery is the key component for fulfilling the organization’s mission., my main point was:

“I think my point is that we need to view all expenses as investments.  You don’t invest in anything unless you at least have a target return in mind.  If your annual report can articluate the return on all of your investments, including overhead, and that number improves over time, then you’re well on your way to making an impressive case for an increase in funding from investors.”

As usual, Dichter is back on topic and says it even better:

“Let us not, as a sector, fall into the trap of listening to critics who say that we should minimize the dollars, effort, brain power, and ingenuity that goes into everything but the “real” work (programs).  In so doing, we risk forgetting that our role is BOTH to find solutions to the persistent problems of inequality and injustice and malnutrition and infant mortality and safe drinking water and AIDS and malaria…AND to figure out how to explain to the world that these problems matter, that we have the tools to solve them, and that if was have the tools to solve them, then we must all act.”

I think a snapshot financial summary that separates overhead from program expenses but does not spell out the return on your overhead investment misses the mark.  And when your data is incomplete, the decisions based on that data is likely to be less than optimal. Good enough -maybe.  But room for improvement – definitely.

So the question for the week: what’s the return your getting on your marketing, fundraising, communications and administrative expenses (aka investments)?  How do you know?  Can you demonstrate it?

LEAVE A COMMENT

Not to beat a dead horse

Mon August 10, 2009

Seth Godin reinforces the point that tactics (tools and plans) are not strategies, points we've made here and here. Godin said it well: "In my experience, people get obsessed about tactical detail before they embrace a strategy... and as a result, when ... Continue reading

LEAVE A COMMENT

Blogging as practice

Mon August 3, 2009

Stories Another thought about keeping content fresh: Blogging is as much about refining and practicing the delivery of your message as it is about actually delivering and spreading a message. All non-profits have a message they are trying to deliver.  And messages ... Continue reading

LEAVE A COMMENT

Where are you on Google?

Mon July 27, 2009

The question asked most frequently when launching a new web site is, "How do I get our new site to the top of Google's search results?" The short and simplest answer is to make sure the content of your site includes ... Continue reading

LEAVE A COMMENT

Keep your content fresh

Thu July 23, 2009

We all know that content is king.  If you expect people to visit your web site more than once, then you need to provide something of value to bring them back.  No amount of fancy bells and whistles on your ... Continue reading

LEAVE A COMMENT

newsletter

handsraise

Who’s Your Enemy?

Feb 2012

The February newsletter: documenting the advocacy disconnect and dealing with nonprofit culture shock when leaping into advocacy.

Read more